<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>

<feed 
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/feeds/atom10.xml" rel="self" title="furiousBlog" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/"                        rel="alternate"    title="furiousBlog" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="furiousBlog" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">furiousBlog</title>
    <subtitle type="html">the blog of some guy called ben</subtitle>
    <icon>http://www.furiousblog.com/templates/default/img/s9y_banner_small.png</icon>
    <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/</id>
    <updated>2008-08-25T15:51:16Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="1.3.1">Serendipity 1.3.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/448-Die,-lawn,-die!-Oh,-wait.-Youre-already-dead..html" rel="alternate" title="Die, lawn, die! Oh, wait. You're already dead." />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-20T23:32:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-25T15:51:16Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=448</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=448</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/12-Life-Stuff" label="Life Stuff" term="Life Stuff" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/448-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Die, lawn, die! Oh, wait. You're already dead.</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Over the past several months, I've become somewhat of a treehugging hippie (I know some of you think I already was, but I've taken it to a new level). I've started composting in massive quantities and started gardening. I also have a lot of plans for rain barrels, a gray water reclamation system and a homemade solar hot water heater amongst other things.<br />
<br />
One of the things that I've been giving a lot of thought to is my lawn. Lawns are a pain in the butt to maintain, require unholy amounts of water, collectively generate more pollution from fertilizer runoff than farms and are completely unnatural.<br />
<br />
For a month or two now, I've had a tab open in Firefox to this great article in the New Yorker:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2008/07/21/080721crbo_books_kolbert?currentPage=all">Turf Wars</a><br />
<br />
It talks about how we ended up with the absurd and unsustainable idea that everyone needed to have a patch of land covered with the exact same type of grass. It also discusses what we had before and a lot of the problems with lawns. I highly recommend reading it.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure what I'm going to do with my lawn. I have a hill in my back yard that I planted grass on to keep it from eroding, but now it's mostly dead. For the bigger part of it, which is a little ways off from the house, I'm going to plant a 'meadow mix' of seed that will grow a mix of wildflowers and other plants. This will control the erosion, but will also require less water and maintenance, and will look good.<br />
<br />
I've got big plans for the other half of the back yard, too, but they're a lot more involved and so will take a lot more time and effort (and money...) to pull off.<br />
<br />
It's the front yard that's the real problem. Currently, it's just grass with some mulched areas next to the house. I've basically decided that I won't water the lawn, so it's not very nice right now. I'm not sure what I'm going to do there, but whatever it is, it will involve the elimination of most of the grass and replacing it with some sort of drought-tolerant, low-maintenance landscaping. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/447-Olympic-Crash.html" rel="alternate" title="Olympic Crash" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-12T17:27:18Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-16T16:25:21Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=447</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=447</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/5-Tech" label="Tech" term="Tech" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/447-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Olympic Crash</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                This is amusing:<br />
<br />
<!-- s9ymdb:297 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="470" height="325" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/downloadedimages/china_wideweb__470x3250.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Full article:<br />
<a   rel="lightbox" href="china_wideweb__470x325,0.jpg">CTRL+ALT+DEL: software malfunction at the opening ceremony</a> (via <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/12/1125213&from=rss">Slashdot</a>)<br />
<br />
The first line of the article is priceless:<br />
<blockquote>Turns out that Bill Gates was not the only famous Microsoft identity to be spotted at the Olympic opening ceremony.</blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/446-Too-fat-to-die.html" rel="alternate" title="Too fat to die?" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-05T12:50:40Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-05T22:32:42Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=446</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=446</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/7-Government-and-Politics" label="Government and Politics" term="Government and Politics" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/446-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Too fat to die?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I've been reading a lot about the death penalty recently. I came across this (morbidly) humorous little article:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/05/us/05brfs-004.html?ref=us">Ohio: Too Fat for the Death Penalty? </a><br />
<blockquote>A death row inmate scheduled for execution says he is too fat to be put to death, arguing that executioners would have trouble finding his veins and that his weight could diminish the effectiveness of one of the lethal injection drugs. Lawyers for the inmate, Richard Wade Cooey II, claim in a federal lawsuit that Mr. Cooey, who weighs 267 pounds, had poor veins when he faced execution five years ago and that the problem has been worsened by weight gain. The lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court, also says that prison officials have had difficulty drawing blood from Mr. Cooey for medical procedures. Mr. Cooey, 41, was sentenced to die for raping and killing two young women in 1986. His execution is scheduled for Oct. 14.</blockquote><br />
<br />
If this works, expect to see the death row currency switch from smokes to sloppy joes. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/445-Good-BoingBoing-day.html" rel="alternate" title="Good BoingBoing day" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-30T17:11:21Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-31T00:01:05Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=445</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=445</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/8-Media" label="Media" term="Media" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/6-Random" label="Random" term="Random" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/5-Tech" label="Tech" term="Tech" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/445-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Good BoingBoing day</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I noticed three interesting items on BoingBoing that I thought I'd point out.<br />
<br />
<ol><li><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/30/orwells-diaries-in-b.html">Orwell's Diaries in Blog Form</a><br />
Quote from <a href="http://orwelldiaries.wordpress.com/">the actual blog</a>:<br />
<blockquote>From 9th August 2008, you will be able to gather your own impression of Orwells face from reading his most strongly individual piece of writing: his diaries. The Orwell Prize is delighted to announce that, to mark the 70th anniversary of the diaries, each diary entry will be published on this blog exactly seventy years after it was written, allowing you to follow Orwells recuperation in Morocco, his return to the UK, and his opinions on the descent of Europe into war in real time. The diaries end in 1942, three years into the conflict.</blockquote><br />
<li><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/29/mom-dad-im-into-stea.html">Mom, Dad, I'm into Steampunk: an imaginary monologue</a><br />
Now, I'm not into steampunk (BoingBoing obviously is), but I read this anyway.  The imaginary monologue is <a href="http://www.mcsweeneys.net/links/monologues/25steampunk.html">here at McSweeney's</a>.  My favorite part is quoted here:<br />
<blockquote>This looks like a late-18th-century organette, correct? Look again. It hides the Dell laptop you got me when I went to college. This bronze hand crank turns it on, and I've hidden a miniature photo printer where the tune sheet is supposed to go. I even installed Linux. </blockquote><br />
<li><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/29/gawker-reports-on-mo.html">Gawker reports on "monster" washed ashore</a><br />
What the?<br />
<!-- s9ymdb:296 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="450" height="337" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/downloadedimages/gawkermonster.JPG" alt="" /><br />
Ok, it's probably a fake...but if not, yikes!<br />
</ul> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/444-Update-to-the-War-on-Photography.html" rel="alternate" title="Update to the War on Photography" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-30T12:47:47Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-30T15:37:26Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=444</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=444</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/7-Government-and-Politics" label="Government and Politics" term="Government and Politics" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/9-Photography" label="Photography" term="Photography" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/444-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Update to the War on Photography</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I noted the ongoing crackdown on photography at DC's union station, in <a href="http://furiousblog.com/archives/434-Schneier-The-War-on-Photography.html'>this previous entry</a>.  In the comments, JK mentioned that he and a friend had been hassled a few years ago and that he thought, as I did, that Union Station was private property and the management was therefore allowed to ban photography, even if it was stupid and didn't actually improve security.<br />
<br />
Apparently, and thankfully, we were wrong.  Union Station is federal property and the management has no right to ban photography.  There was a hearing on the matter a week or so ago held by Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton from DC.<br />
<br />
Blogger Joel Lawson of <a href="http://lightboxdc.blogspot.com">LightBoxDC</a> was there and posted about it:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.furiousblog.com/http://lightboxdc.blogspot.com/2008/07/norton-schools-union-station-management.html">Norton Schools Union Station Management on Photo Rights, Other Issues</a><br />
<blockquote>Norton also reinforced the fact that Union Station, while hosting a mix of retail and other uses, remains public property.  "The overriding public interest has never been in doubt: to provide the public access to a federally owned facility," Norton stated.</blockquote><br />
...<br />
<blockquote>Station managers said they're working to fix the problem, but Norton branded management's approach "pathetic" and demanded immediate removal of their signs claiming Union Station is private property and that photography can be banned at their discretion. </blockquote><br />
<br />
The LightBoxDC post has links to more coverage.  You can view the whole hearing <a href="http://transportation.edgeboss.net/wmedia/transportation/20080722ed.wvx">here</a>. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/443-Argh!.html" rel="alternate" title="Argh!" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-24T13:32:46Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-24T17:49:49Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=443</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=443</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/3-Blogging" label="Blogging" term="Blogging" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/443-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Argh!</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                The other day, the plugin that shows my flickr photos here on furiousBlog started generating an error.  I tried to fix it, but haven't been able to.  Obnoxious. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/442-furiousBlog-is-3.html" rel="alternate" title="furiousBlog is 3" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-15T14:48:51Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-15T14:48:51Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=442</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=442</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/3-Blogging" label="Blogging" term="Blogging" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/442-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">furiousBlog is 3</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I can't seem to remember to post when my blog ages.  Anyway, I've been blogging furiously for 3 years as of June 7th. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/441-Horrible-Reminder.html" rel="alternate" title="Horrible Reminder" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-15T13:14:36Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-16T13:28:06Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=441</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=441</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/8-Media" label="Media" term="Media" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/441-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Horrible Reminder</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Just wanted to remind everyone that Act 1 of Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog is up today.  Acts 2 &amp; 3 will be up Thursday and Saturday.  I just watched it; it's great.<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://www.drhorrible.com/'><!-- s9ymdb:295 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="200" height="54" style="border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/downloadedimages/drhorribletitle.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a></div> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/440-Is-nothing-sacred.html" rel="alternate" title="Is nothing sacred?" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-10T13:58:01Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-10T20:51:23Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=440</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=440</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/6-Random" label="Random" term="Random" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/5-Tech" label="Tech" term="Tech" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/440-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Is nothing sacred?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Seriously, this time they've gone too far!  I'm fine with robots that play chess, vacuum my floor, build my cars, milk my cows or raise my kids, but an air hockey playing robot is over the line!  <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208803140">Robots aim to top humans at air hockey</a> (via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/09/2014228&from=rss">Slashdot</a>)<br />
<blockquote>First, a supercomputer beats a chess master. Then, an artificial intelligence program deals defeat to a poker champion. Next: A robot takes on humans in air hockey. </blockquote><br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ybRGpldZKy8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ybRGpldZKy8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
In a <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=608853&cid=24125147">comment on slashdot</a>, Idontgno says it best:<br />
<blockquote>First they're beating us at chess, then at air hockey... pretty soon they're rolling around yelling "EX..TER..MI..NATE", disintegrating us, and avoiding staircases.</blockquote> 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/439-Who-Killed-the-Electric-Car.html" rel="alternate" title="Who Killed the Electric Car?" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-09T13:22:35Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-10T12:27:39Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=439</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=439</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/8-Media" label="Media" term="Media" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/5-Tech" label="Tech" term="Tech" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/439-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Who Killed the Electric Car?</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <a class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://www.sonyclassics.com/whokilledtheelectriccar'><!-- s9ymdb:294 --><img class="serendipity_image_right" width="266" height="399" style="float: right; border: 1px solid #000; margin: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/downloadedimages/whokilledelectriccar.jpg" alt="" /></a>Has anyone seen the documentary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489037/">"Who Killed the Electric Car?"</a>?  We watched it last night, and I'm still all fired up.  <br />
<br />
It deals mainly with the GM EV-1, and all-electric car that came about because of the zero-emissions mandate enacted by California in  the early 90's.  It shows how they were fast (really fast!) and quiet, but doesn't shy away from their downsides, mainly their limited range (60 miles per charge at first, but 120 in the later models--newer lithium-ion batteries in an EV-1 could easily do 300).  <br />
<br />
They were much loved by the people leasing them, but then when the leases were up, GM wouldn't re-up the leases, collected all the cars and destroyed them.  No official explanation was given, but several auto industry representatives said that no one wanted a car that could only go 120 miles per charge and required charging overnight (but could get an 85% charge in an hour).  This was in spite of a huge waiting list due to the fact that they insisted on hand assembling the cars, which artificially drove up the price and increased production time. <br />
<br />
Personally, I would LOVE a car that I could plug in overnight that would take me to work &amp; back each day with some charge left over for some errands.  To think that such a thing existed, was actually on the roads and was killed really turns my stomach, especially in light of the mess we're in right now with gas prices.  Since they were taken off the roads, we could've had 6 more years of development and improvement on these cars, but instead we're wasting money and time on pie-in-the-sky ideas like hydrogen cars and half measures like hybrids, with a bright light being plug-in hybrids that should be here 'soon.'<br />
<br />
I can only imagine how well these would sell these days.  If only GM had stuck with it, they'd be raking in the money instead of losing billions on big gas-guzzling SUVs.<br />
<br />
<b>I highly recommend this movie.  I can't recommend it enough.</b><br />
<br />
This guy, however, <a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/karl/2006/06/gms-ev1----who-killed-common-sense.html">disagrees</a>.  While there is some truth to some of the points he makes (specifically the list in #1), mostly he's having fun calling conjecture 'fact.'  You can have your own fun by comparing his argument tactics to Wikipedia's list of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies">logical fallacies</a>.  While you're at it, you may as well figure out which one I'm using in this paragraph <img src="http://www.furiousblog.com/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png" alt=":-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> <br />
<br />
On a side note, the movie also touches on how, in the mid 20th century, GM bought out a bunch of streetcar companies, dismantled the electric streetcars and replaced them with GM buses.  More info <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_Streetcar_Scandal">here</a>. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/438-Long-live-the-Yaris!.html" rel="alternate" title="Long live the Yaris!" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-03T22:33:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-07T18:43:06Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=438</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=438</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/12-Life-Stuff" label="Life Stuff" term="Life Stuff" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/438-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Long live the Yaris!</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                To replace the newly-dead Camry, we bought a used 2007 <a href="http://www.toyota.com/yaris/">Toyota Yaris</a>.  I had been looking into them a few months ago, but couldn't justify buying anything until the Camry kicked the bucket.  It's too bad, though, because with the price of gas going up, everyone is buying Yarises (Yarii?) and the prices reflect the increased demand.  When I was first looking, I found several used ones for around $10,000.  Now, though, they're really hard to find and the prices have gone up.  The dealership I bought from had two and was the only dealership within a hundred miles to have two.  All the others had one or none.  When looking, I would see a new listing and it would be gone <br />
<br />
I wanted something small, looked ok and was more fuel-efficient.  Oh yeah, it had to be affordable.  The Yaris is definitely all of these things.  It's small enough on the outside to park basically anywhere.  Yet, it's surprisingly roomy on the inside and is quite comfortable even in the backseat.  I was nervous about picking up slugs in it, so I got in the back even before the test drive.  I did have two huge guys as slugs the other day, and it was a little snug.<br />
<br />
I found a list of the top 8 or 10 most fuel-efficient cars of 2007 &amp; the Yaris was #7.  The rest were hybrids and costed on average twice the price of my Yaris.  The 2007's mileage was listed as 34 or 35 city and 39 highway.  The EPA changed how they calculate mileage, though and the new ones (same exact car) are listed as 29/35.  Using some moderate <a href="http://www.cleanmpg.com/cmps_index.php?page=hypermiling">hypermiling</a> techniques, I'm hoping to get over 40, though.  I plan on posting more on this later.<br />
<br />
So, I love my Yaris.  I've never really had a car that I actually liked.  They've always been just cars.  But, I actually enjoy driving the Yaris.  It's like driving a go-kart (in a good way).  Here are a bunch of pictures of it that I snagged from the dealership's site.<br />
<br />
<div style="clear:both;" align="center"><a  class='serendipity_image_link'  rel='lightbox' href='http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar1.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:287 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="200" height="150" style="float: left; border: 1px solid #000; margin: 5px; " src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar1.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a> <a  class='serendipity_image_link'  rel='lightbox' href='http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar5.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:290 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="200" height="150" style="float: left; border: 1px solid #000; margin: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar5.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a> <a  class='serendipity_image_link'  rel='lightbox' href='http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar6.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:291 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="200" height="150" style="float: left; border: 1px solid #000; margin: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar6.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a> <a  class='serendipity_image_link'  rel='lightbox' href='http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar9.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:293 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="200" height="150" style="float: left; border: 1px solid #000; margin: 5px;" src="http://www.furiousblog.com/uploads/yar9.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><div style="clear:both;">&#160;</a><br />
 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/437-The-camry-is-dead,-a-eulogy.html" rel="alternate" title="The camry is dead, a eulogy" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-02T18:05:19Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-06T21:38:24Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=437</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=437</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/12-Life-Stuff" label="Life Stuff" term="Life Stuff" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/437-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">The camry is dead, a eulogy</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                On Friday, June 20th at approximately 5:15 p.m., our Camry died a quiet death.  It was very old and it was time for it to go.  When something has lived a long full life, it is not a thing of sadness when it goes softly into the long sleep.  The Camry was originally my parents' and I had been driving it for almost half of my life.  It was model year 1994 and had 214,000 miles on it.  <br />
<br />
Recently, it had stopped working and was out of commission for several months.  When he was finally able to revive it, my mechanic friend told me that the cooling system was rusting, the transmission was going and that massive timing belt failure was imminent.  The coolant was a deep orange/copper color.  I took it in and had a life-extending radiator flush performed.  After what seemed like an agonizing eternity, but was really an agonizing two hours, the mechanic performing the flush came to me and told me that he had done all he could; he had flushed the radiator twelve times with little effect.  I thanked him and took my ailing car home.<br />
<br />
I put in some transmission fluid, and after that it performed beautifully--almost like it used to.  I drove it every day with no problems.  I could almost pretend that the inevitable was not near.  Then, the window died and wouldn't close.  I took it into the shop and they told me the cost and asked if I really wanted to spend that much on a car that is obviously on its way out.  They were able to close the window and advised I not open it again.  I thanked him and took my ailing car home again.<br />
<br />
A few weeks later, I accidentally pressed the wrong button and opened the window a smidge.  I couldn't get it back up, so I performed a little open-door surgery of my own.  I cut the wires that are responsible for raising and lowering the window and attached a rope to the window sled.  This way, I could close the window simply by pulling on the rope and then tying it onto the door handle.  It was not an elegant sight.<br />
<br />
We, the Camry and I, went on this way for a couple months until that fateful Friday, two weeks ago.  It is only now that I can bring myself to speak of it.  <br />
<br />
The day was unremarkable, unlike any other.  I had driven a couple slugs to work and a couple others home.  Upon arriving home, I left again to take Elise to gymnastics.  I dropper her off and started home.  About two miles down the road the engine cut out and I drifted over the side of the road, knowing this was it--the Camry would never move of its own accord again.<br />
<br />
There was much discussion of whether it even made sense to pay someone to tow it to the shop.  In the end, we decided we should do so, just in case.  We all knew it was futile, but still we hoped.  Within hours, the shop called with the cause of death; the timing belt had given out.  It gave its all right up to the last.  It ensured that the slugs made it home and that Elise arrived safely at gymnastics.  But then it could give no more and was gone.<br />
<br />
Farewell, Camry.  We thank you. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/436-I-love-Joss-Whedon-UPDATED.html" rel="alternate" title="I love Joss Whedon -- UPDATED" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-25T12:37:53Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-01T14:29:53Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=436</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=436</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/8-Media" label="Media" term="Media" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/436-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">I love Joss Whedon -- UPDATED</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Have I ever mentioned that? <img src="http://www.furiousblog.com/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png" alt=":-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /><br /><br />Here's the preview from his upcoming 'Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog':<br /><br /><object width="400" height="225">	<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />	<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />	<param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1227202&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" />	<embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1227202&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="225"></embed></object><br /><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1227202?pg=embed&sec=1227202">Teaser</a> from <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/user542290?pg=embed&sec=1227202">Dr. Horrible&#039;s Sing-Along Blog</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com?pg=embed&sec=1227202">Vimeo</a>.<br /><br />In other Joss news, he will be returning to TV (his true home) with 'Dollhouse,' which also looks excellent.<br /><br />And lastly, Cyndi &amp; I are slowly rewatching Buffy the Vampire Slayer.  We're nearing the end of season 2.  It's truly the perfect TV show.  Way better than that crap JK mentioned years ago when I told him he should watch it, but he wouldn't because he doesn't like 'that kind of show.'<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Update 7/1/08:</b>  There's a comic to introduce the characters <a href="http://www.myspace.com/darkhorsepresents?issuenum=12&storynum=2">here</a>. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/435-Tweeting-for-Votes-UPDATED.html" rel="alternate" title="Tweeting for Votes -- UPDATED" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-23T13:05:52Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-25T14:02:31Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=435</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=435</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/7-Government-and-Politics" label="Government and Politics" term="Government and Politics" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/5-Tech" label="Tech" term="Tech" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/435-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Tweeting for Votes -- UPDATED</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I <a href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/426-Barack-Obama-is-now-following-you-on-Twitter%21.html">posted recently</a> about the presidential candidates' usage of new tech, including twitter.  <br /><br />I'm still following both <a href="http://twitter.com/JohnMcCain2008">McCain</a> &amp; <a href="http://twitter.com/BarackObama">Obama</a> (Clinton, too, but that's just because I haven't removed her yet).  The stats in that previous post have continued along the same trajectories.  McCain continues to tweet 2.5 times for each Obama tweet (M:343 , O:138; Obama still has about 29 times as many followers (M: 1,482, O:42,557).  <br /><br />I still can't decide who is using twitter to it's fullest potential.  Obviously, Obama's tweets are spreading much faster than McCain's due to his overwhelming follower count, but McCain is using it more.  Also, McCain will often reply to a direct message, showing that someone is actually reading the feed of people he's following.  I haven't seen any replies from Obama, which indicates that he's using it more as a soapbox and less as an interactive communications medium.  So, McCain probably wins on actually embracing twitter, while Obama is probably getting the most benefit from it.<br /><br />While analyzing the statistics like this is interesting, it's obviously only a side note.  What's far more important is the message that each candidate is putting out.  To that end, here are a few recent tweets that I think are illustrative of each canidate's use of twitter.  These are all pulled from the tweets currently showing on their twitter page, which shows the most recent twenty or so tweets.  In case you think that my selections are biased, I invite you to visit either candiate's twitter page and see for yourself.  I've linked them to their names in the second paragraph above.  I'm certain that whenever you do this, even months from now, you'll see a similar tenor on each feed.<br /><br />McCain:<br /><blockquote>New book "fleeced" by Dick Morris <a href="http://twurl.nl/iiayyc" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://twurl.nl/iiayyc</a> What would Obama do to country as President?<br /><br /><span class="entry-content">Obama with more endorsments: <a href="http://twurl.nl/vlexa4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://twurl.nl/vlexa4</a> from North Korean and Libyan Dictators, next Zimbabwe?</span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">What do you think, has the surge worked? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5vss6a" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/5vss6a</a></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">@<a href="http://twitter.com/MrBabyMan">MrBabyMan</a> sorry I don't.  Do you happen to know any dem leaders willing to help us lower oil prices by allowing drilling?  Just looking</span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">@<a href="http://twitter.com/MargaretSchaut">MargaretSchaut</a> Naw, that's not the case, ask average Joe who works all week to gain a Saturday with family, does he want Obama, nope </span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">More hypocrisy <a href="http://twurl.nl/8y67d6" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://twurl.nl/8y67d6</a> Obama manipulating patriotic images though he says there's too much manipulation of patriotism</span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content"> 			  Why are the Democrats working so hard to increase the price of gas? </span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">Mitt Romney on Obama's problem <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6f7xsc" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/6f7xsc</a></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="meta entry-meta"></span><span class="entry-content"> 			  Israel taking precautions to protect themselves if Obama wins <a href="http://twurl.nl/1vsi3i" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://twurl.nl/1vsi3i</a> and tries to force them to concede</span><br /></blockquote>     		 	 	     		    		  	  		                              		    	 		 				  					<br />Obama:<br /><blockquote>In Chicago,holding an economic discussion with the Democratic governors.  Watch it live now at <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/livestream" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://my.barackobama.com/l...</a><br /><br /><span class="entry-content">Made an important decision today and wanted to share it with you. Visit <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/mydecision" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://my.barackobama.com/m...</a></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">Honored to be endorsed by Al Gore in Michigan tonight.  Watch live streaming video at 8:30pm EST at <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/livestream" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://my.barackobama.com/l...</a> </span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">Wishing everyone a Happy Father's Day. Spoke today at the Apostolic Church of God in Chicago. Read remarks at <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/dad" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://my.barackobama.com/dad</a> </span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">Pleased with today's Supreme Court decision to bring terrorists to justice while also protecting our core values. <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.barackobama.com</a></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">Kicking-off a two week tour focusing on the current economic crisis &amp; the need for new economic policy: <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/NCspeech" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://my.barackobama.com/N...</a></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content">IN St Paul, MN speaking after securing the nomination.  Watch the speech live on TV tonight or streamed <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/nominee" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://my.barackobama.com/n...</a> </span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span><span class="entry-content"> 			  In Middletown, CT. Pinch-hitting for Senator Kennedy and delivering the commencement address for Wesleyan University.</span><br /><br /><span class="entry-content">In MI, unveiling my manufacturing agenda. It's time to recapture the spirit of innovation that has always fueled America's economic success.</span><br /><span class="entry-content"></span></blockquote><span class="entry-content"><br />So, McCain is on the attack, while Obama is spreading ideas (wow, that doesn't sound at all like I'm drinking the Obama Kool-Aid, does it? <img src="http://www.furiousblog.com/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png" alt=":-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" />  ).  Seriously, though, McCain's feed is filled with vitriol and sarcasm, while Obama is talking about his platform and campaign.  You have to go back to April 3 to see a tweet that mentions McCain, and it's not the silly fear-mongering (next Zimbabwe?) coming from McCain:<br /><br /></span><blockquote><span class="entry-content">Troubled by today's unemployment figures, the latest indicator of how badly America needs fundamental change from Bush-McCain policies.</span><br /></blockquote><br />While, the fact is that Obama will probably win due to Republican's current unpopularity (unless he royally screws something up, of course) this difference in attitude or strategy sure won't help McCain.  It really shows him to be the same old politician that we all know and hate.  It's really too bad, because for a long time, he was the only Republican a Democrat or left-leaning hater-of-all-parties like myself, could respect.  But, just as Romney sold his previously-more-centrist political soul to the right-wing, so has McCain.<br />
<br />
<b>Update 6/23 2:00:</b>  Apparently, I'm not the only one thinking about politics &amp; twitter:  <a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/21/1931232&from=rss">Twitter As a Campaigning Tool</a> and <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91779992">How Twitter Can Change the Presidential Debate</a>.<br />
<br />
 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/434-Schneier-The-War-on-Photography.html" rel="alternate" title="Schneier: The War on Photography" />
        <author>
            <name>ben</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-18T16:53:39Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-25T12:38:58Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.furiousblog.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=434</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.furiousblog.com/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=434</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/7-Government-and-Politics" label="Government and Politics" term="Government and Politics" />
            <category scheme="http://www.furiousblog.com/categories/9-Photography" label="Photography" term="Photography" />
    
        <id>http://www.furiousblog.com/archives/434-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Schneier: The War on Photography</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.furiousblog.com/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                A while ago, security expert and all-around common sense advocate Bruce Schneier wrote the following essay.  He posted it to his blog the day before Lori was born; thus the delay in my posting about it.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/06/the_war_on_phot.html#c275864">The War on Photography</a><br />
<blockquote>Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography.  <a href="http://nycphotorights.com/wordpress/?p=110">Photographers</a> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7351252.stm">have</a> <a href="http://www.allensphotoblog.com/blog1/2007/09/photography_terrorism.html">been</a> <a href="http://flash.popphoto.com/blog/2007/06/the-crime-of-ph.html">harassed</a>, <a href="http://flash.popphoto.com/blog/2007/10/the-crime-of-ph.html">questioned</a>, <a href="http://flash.popphoto.com/blog/2007/09/the-crime-of-ph.html">detained</a>, <a href="http://flash.popphoto.com/blog/2007/11/the-crime-of-ph.html">arrested</a> or <a href="http://www.episcopalcafe.com/daily/war_and_peace/every_day_diplomacy.php">worse</a>, and <a href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=71473815&amp;blogID=394235689">declared</a> <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/05/14/bb-reader-two-fbi-ag.html">to</a> <a href="http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2008/05/almost_arrested_for_taking_photos_at_uni.html">be</a> <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/rawfisher/2008/05/union_station_photo_follies.html">unwelcome</a>. We've been repeatedly told to <a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Antiterror_police_defend_campaign_targeting_suspicious_behaviour_of_people_with_cameras_news_195594.html">watch</a> <a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23553587-952,00.html">out</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/02/10/askthepilot173/index.html">for</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/arts/design/20shat.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1210125984-qrPPfpI/kDlEi+wMrOvtEA">photographers</a>, especially <a href="http://lightchasersphotography.com/blog/how-to-shoot-photographs-like-a-terrorist/">suspicious</a> <a href="http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Content?oid=oid%3A41348">ones</a>.  Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.<br />
<br />
Except that it's <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/03/uk-politician-c.html">nonsense</a>. The 9/11 terrorists didn't photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn't photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn't photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren't being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn't known for its photography. Even those <a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-174.html">manufactured terrorist plots</a> that the US government likes to talk about -- the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 -- no photography.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
It's quick and a must-read for anyone interested in photography or the erosion of our rights.  <br />
<br />
This brings to mind a couple of recent cases of security over-stepping their authority at DC's Union Station.  First, was an NPR photographer who was testing some new equipment there when <a href="http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2008/05/almost_arrested_for_taking_photos_at_uni.html">he was almost arrested</a>.  And then, while doing a report on photographers being hassled at Union Station, the camera crew of our local Fox affiliate was <a href="http://dcist.com/2008/06/02/fox_5_reporter.php">hassled by Union Station security</a>. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>

</feed>